Re: What is the truth about Linux 2.4's RAM limitations?

From: Chris Wedgwood (cw@f00f.org)
Date: Tue Jul 10 2001 - 13:43:55 EST


On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 02:28:54PM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote:

    Jesse Pollard wrote:

> If the entire page table were given to a user, then a full cache
> flush would have to be done on every context switch and system
> call. That would be very slow, but would allow a full 4G address
> for the user.

    A full cache flush would be needed at every entry into the kernel,
    including hardware interrupts. Very poor for performance.

Why would a cache flush be necessary at all? I assume ia32 caches
where physically not virtually mapped?

   --cw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 15 2001 - 21:00:12 EST