Re: What are rules for acpi_ex_enter_interpreter?

• Next message: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel: "Re: [PATCH] More pedantry."
• Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] struct kernel_stat -> struct cpu_stat[NR_CPUS]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi!

> > I did NOT verified other callers of acpi_walk_namespace... And there
> > is still some problem left, as although now S5 is listed as available,
> > poweroff still does nothing instead of poweroff.
>
> Replying to myself, after following change in additon to acpi_ex_...
> poweroff on my machine works. It should probably map type 0 => 0, 3 => 1
> and 7 => 2, but it is hard to decide without VIA datasheet, so change
> below is minimal change needed to get poweroff through ACPI to work on my
> ASUS A7V.

You should printk loudly during bootup, so people know their hw is b0rken.

-- 
Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt,
details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/velo/index.html.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel: "Re: [PATCH] More pedantry."
• Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] struct kernel_stat -> struct cpu_stat[NR_CPUS]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 15 2001 - 21:00:18 EST