SOMAXCONN - bump up or sysctl?

From: Tim Hockin (thockin@sun.com)
Date: Thu Jul 12 2001 - 23:52:49 EST

Next message: Marcelo Tosatti: "Updated VM statistics patch"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: 2x Oracle slowdown from 2.2.16 to 2.4.4"
Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: SOMAXCONN - bump up or sysctl?"
Maybe reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: SOMAXCONN - bump up or sysctl?"
Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: SOMAXCONN - bump up or sysctl?"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: SOMAXCONN - bump up or sysctl?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

hey all,

We have a request to bump up SOMAXCONN. Are there are repurcussions to
doing so? Would it be better to make it a sysctl?

-- 
Tim Hockin
Systems Software Engineer
Sun Microsystems, Cobalt Server Appliances
thockin@sun.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Marcelo Tosatti: "Updated VM statistics patch"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: 2x Oracle slowdown from 2.2.16 to 2.4.4"
Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: SOMAXCONN - bump up or sysctl?"
Maybe reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: SOMAXCONN - bump up or sysctl?"
Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: SOMAXCONN - bump up or sysctl?"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: SOMAXCONN - bump up or sysctl?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 15 2001 - 21:00:18 EST