On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> I will if Honza assures me that no future version of gcc will cause me to
> crash if I don't declare xtime volatile and I play with it while it can
> change under me (which seems not the case from his last email).
WHY DO YOU NOT ADD THE "VOLATILE" TO THE PLACES THAT _CARE_?
This is not a gcc issue. Even if gcc _were_ to generate bad code, the
global volatile _still_ wouldn't be the correct answer.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 31 2001 - 21:00:25 EST