Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> On Fri, 3 Aug 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > Do you think this happened during the e2fsck run, or during the
> > actual mount?
>
> actual mount. s/fsync_dev/fsync_no_super/ in fs/jbd/*. Already fixed
> in Alan's tree.
Ah. Thanks. Linus doesn't seem to have fsync_no_super(), so some
compatibility hacks will be needed there.
Why does fsync_no_super() exist? I assume some locking changes
somewhere?
> BTW, code around the place in question looks somewhat fishy - looks
> like you have a lot of stuff assuming that journal and fs are on the
> same device.
Yes - this was fixed up when we were testing the external journal
support for 0.9.5. -ac4 has 0.9.3+bits.
-
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 07 2001 - 21:00:29 EST