On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 03:40:00PM -0400, Hubertus Franke wrote:
>
> We did not modify the UP code at all. There will be NO effects (positive
> nor negative) what so ever.
Cool. So the obvious next question is
How does it compare on a dual to the current Linux scheduler?
Obviously:
Performance sucks on two processors but scales well
would not be a good thing.
>
> Hubertus Franke
> Enterprise Linux Group (Mgr), Linux Technology Center (Member Scalability)
> , OS-PIC (Chair)
> email: frankeh@us.ibm.com
> (w) 914-945-2003 (fax) 914-945-4425 TL: 862-2003
>
>
>
> Victor Yodaiken <yodaiken@fsmlabs.com> on 08/08/2001 03:27:55 PM
>
> To: Mike Kravetz <mkravetz@sequent.com>
> cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>, Hubertus
> Franke/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Scalable Scheduling
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 11:28:00AM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> > One challenge will be maintaining the same level of performance
> > for UP as in the current code. The current code has #ifdefs to
>
> How does the "current code" compare to the current Linux UP code?
>
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 15 2001 - 21:00:20 EST