Renaud Guérin wrote:
> The following part of the 2.4.8 patch seems to be a typo (">>" looks more
> logical than ">" if vci_bit is a bitfield), and broke ATM for me:
Yes, the patch is 100% wrong and should be reverted. It had been sent to
the ATM maintainers and was rejected, but someone else must have submitted
it upstream since it magically appeared in the mainstream kernel. It's
already been reverted in both 2.4.9pre1 and 2.4.8ac1.
-Mitch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 15 2001 - 21:00:43 EST