PinkFreud wrote:
>I wasn't aware VIA nor Matrox were broken. I've seen someone else mention in
>this thread that perhaps some old HOWTOs on hardware need to be maintained
>again - I think I agree with that.
>
VIA comes up as a bloody thorn quite often it seems. I have a VIA 586B
system and it seems to work decently but I think I'm just lucky
considering the large number of broken VIA chipset complaints.
>Perhaps series name should be changed from 'stable' to something else -
>'release'?
>
Erm...they are called release. 2.<even> is a release kernel and 2.<odd>
is a development kernel. Some people (myself included) fight the
impression given by a lot of people of stable/unstable naming.
Typically called slashdotters...</humor>
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 15 2001 - 21:00:50 EST