Re: 2.4.8 Resource leaks + limits

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Fri Aug 17 2001 - 17:01:57 EST


On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Alan Cox wrote:

> > i would think to put global limits in /proc or in a flat text /etc
> > and per user limits in something like /etc/passwd or /etc/shadow?
> > Is it against any standard to have extra fields in those files?
>
> Take a look at the pam modules, they already handle limit
> configuration per user, and I think all the major Linux (and
> also stuff like Solaris) distros run PAM based auth

Alan, would you accept the trivial version of per-user
CPU scheduling for 2.4 if there is a lot of demand ?

The code has been running in Conectiva's kernel RPM for
over a year now, is implemented entirely in the recalculate
part of the scheduler, leaves the scheduler fast path all
alone and only needs to be properly ported to newer 2.4
kernels now...

regards,

Rik

--
IA64: a worthy successor to the i860.

http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 23 2001 - 21:00:25 EST