Re: PROBLEM: select() says closed socket readable

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Tue Aug 21 2001 - 13:38:51 EST


> No, because 'select' is defined to work the same on both blocking and
> non-blocking sockets. Roughly, select should hit on read if a non-blocking
> read wouldn't return 'would block'.

Select is not reliable for a blocking socket in all cases. There is always
a risk select may return "data to read" and the read will find there is now
none. It isnt going to bite anyone on Linux with our current protocols but
it may bite portable code
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 23 2001 - 21:00:44 EST