Ok, here's a version against 2.4.8-ac8, tested against ext2 and
reiserfs. Andreas reported ext3 success with the last patch,
and none of the LVM guys have complained yet ;-)
BTW [sistina folks], it might be a good idea to update lvm-1.0.x
the 2.4.4 VFS-lock patches no longer apply cleanly.
Alan, please include:
-chris
# allow LVM to lock the filesystem during snapshot creation, so the
# FS can flush pending changes and put things into a consistent state.
#
# includes small fix to current reiserfs support, forcing a transaction
# commit during the lock.
#
#
diff -Nru a/drivers/md/lvm.c b/drivers/md/lvm.c
--- a/drivers/md/lvm.c Tue Aug 21 23:55:59 2001
+++ b/drivers/md/lvm.c Tue Aug 21 23:55:59 2001
@@ -182,9 +182,6 @@
#define DEVICE_OFF(device)
#define LOCAL_END_REQUEST
-/* lvm_do_lv_create calls fsync_dev_lockfs()/unlockfs() */
-/* #define LVM_VFS_ENHANCEMENT */
-
#include <linux/config.h>
#include <linux/version.h>
@@ -1933,12 +1930,8 @@
if (lv_ptr->lv_access & LV_SNAPSHOT) {
lv_t *org = lv_ptr->lv_snapshot_org, *last;
- /* sync the original logical volume */
- fsync_dev(org->lv_dev);
-#ifdef LVM_VFS_ENHANCEMENT
/* VFS function call to sync and lock the filesystem */
fsync_dev_lockfs(org->lv_dev);
-#endif
down(&org->lv_snapshot_sem);
org->lv_access |= LV_SNAPSHOT_ORG;
@@ -1962,12 +1955,10 @@
else
set_device_ro(lv_ptr->lv_dev, 1);
-#ifdef LVM_VFS_ENHANCEMENT
/* VFS function call to unlock the filesystem */
if (lv_ptr->lv_access & LV_SNAPSHOT) {
unlockfs(lv_ptr->lv_snapshot_org->lv_dev);
}
-#endif
lv_ptr->vg = vg_ptr;
diff -Nru a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
--- a/fs/buffer.c Tue Aug 21 23:55:59 2001
+++ b/fs/buffer.c Tue Aug 21 23:55:59 2001
@@ -350,6 +350,34 @@
fsync_dev(dev);
}
+int fsync_dev_lockfs(kdev_t dev)
+{
+ /* you are not allowed to try locking all the filesystems
+ ** on the system, your chances of getting through without
+ ** total deadlock are slim to none.
+ */
+ if (!dev)
+ return fsync_dev(dev) ;
+
+ sync_buffers(dev, 0);
+
+ lock_kernel();
+ /* note, the FS might need to start transactions to
+ ** sync the inodes, or the quota, no locking until
+ ** after these are done
+ */
+ sync_inodes(dev);
+ DQUOT_SYNC(dev);
+ /* if inodes or quotas could be dirtied during the
+ ** sync_supers_lockfs call, the FS is responsible for getting
+ ** them on disk, without deadlocking against the lock
+ */
+ sync_supers_lockfs(dev) ;
+ unlock_kernel();
+
+ return sync_buffers(dev, 1) ;
+}
+
asmlinkage long sys_sync(void)
{
fsync_dev(0);
diff -Nru a/fs/reiserfs/super.c b/fs/reiserfs/super.c
--- a/fs/reiserfs/super.c Tue Aug 21 23:55:59 2001
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/super.c Tue Aug 21 23:55:59 2001
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@
reiserfs_prepare_for_journal(s, SB_BUFFER_WITH_SB(s), 1);
journal_mark_dirty(&th, s, SB_BUFFER_WITH_SB (s));
reiserfs_block_writes(&th) ;
- journal_end(&th, s, 1) ;
+ journal_end_sync(&th, s, 1) ;
}
s->s_dirt = dirty;
unlock_kernel() ;
diff -Nru a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
--- a/fs/super.c Tue Aug 21 23:55:59 2001
+++ b/fs/super.c Tue Aug 21 23:55:59 2001
@@ -637,6 +637,18 @@
sb->s_op->write_super(sb);
unlock_super(sb);
}
+
+static inline void write_super_lockfs(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+ lock_super(sb);
+ if (sb->s_root && sb->s_op) {
+ if (sb->s_dirt && sb->s_op->write_super)
+ sb->s_op->write_super(sb);
+ if (sb->s_op->write_super_lockfs)
+ sb->s_op->write_super_lockfs(sb);
+ }
+ unlock_super(sb);
+}
/*
* Note: check the dirty flag before waiting, so we don't
@@ -670,6 +682,48 @@
} else
sb = sb_entry(sb->s_list.next);
spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Note: don't check the dirty flag before waiting, we want the lock
+ * to happen every time this is called. dev must be non-zero
+ */
+void sync_supers_lockfs(kdev_t dev)
+{
+ struct super_block * sb;
+
+ if (dev) {
+ sb = get_super(dev);
+ if (sb) {
+ write_super_lockfs(sb);
+ drop_super(sb);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+void unlockfs(kdev_t dev)
+{
+ struct super_block * sb;
+
+ if (dev) {
+ /* we cannot lock the super here because someone
+ ** might be waiting on the unlock with the
+ ** super already locked
+ **
+ ** so, we grab the mount semaphore instead, we have
+ ** to make sure nobody is mounting during our
+ ** unlock operation. The FS won't unmount because it
+ ** was locked.
+ */
+ down(&mount_sem);
+ sb = get_super(dev);
+ if (sb) {
+ if (sb->s_op && sb->s_op->unlockfs)
+ sb->s_op->unlockfs(sb) ;
+ drop_super(sb);
+ }
+ up(&mount_sem);
+ }
}
/**
diff -Nru a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
--- a/include/linux/fs.h Tue Aug 21 23:55:59 2001
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h Tue Aug 21 23:55:59 2001
@@ -1223,6 +1223,7 @@
extern void write_inode_now(struct inode *, int);
extern void sync_dev(kdev_t);
extern int fsync_dev(kdev_t);
+extern int fsync_dev_lockfs(kdev_t);
extern int fsync_super(struct super_block *);
extern int fsync_no_super(kdev_t);
extern void sync_inodes_sb(struct super_block *);
@@ -1232,6 +1233,8 @@
extern void filemap_fdatasync(struct address_space *);
extern void filemap_fdatawait(struct address_space *);
extern void sync_supers(kdev_t);
+extern void sync_supers_lockfs(kdev_t);
+extern void unlockfs(kdev_t);
extern int bmap(struct inode *, int);
extern int notify_change(struct dentry *, struct iattr *);
extern int permission(struct inode *, int);
diff -Nru a/kernel/ksyms.c b/kernel/ksyms.c
--- a/kernel/ksyms.c Tue Aug 21 23:55:59 2001
+++ b/kernel/ksyms.c Tue Aug 21 23:55:59 2001
@@ -178,6 +178,8 @@
EXPORT_SYMBOL(invalidate_inode_pages);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(truncate_inode_pages);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(fsync_dev);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(fsync_dev_lockfs);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(unlockfs);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(fsync_no_super);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(permission);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(vfs_permission);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 23 2001 - 21:00:47 EST