Re: Will 2.6 require Python for any configuration ? (CML2)

From: Mark Hahn (hahn@physics.mcmaster.ca)
Date: Fri Aug 24 2001 - 10:01:13 EST

Next message: Martin Mares: "Re: problem with includes: pc_keyb.h"
Previous message: Anders Peter Fugmann: "Re: [PATCH] const initdata."
In reply to: Denis Perchine: "Re: Will 2.6 require Python for any configuration ? (CML2)"
Next in thread: Matthias Andree: "Re: Will 2.6 require Python for any configuration ? (CML2)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> But having Python just to configure a kernel is an overkill. Why not Sather, or other rarely used language.
> Oberon-2 would be also nice.

obviously, Prolog would be The Right Thing for doing kernel dependencies.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Martin Mares: "Re: problem with includes: pc_keyb.h"
Previous message: Anders Peter Fugmann: "Re: [PATCH] const initdata."
In reply to: Denis Perchine: "Re: Will 2.6 require Python for any configuration ? (CML2)"
Next in thread: Matthias Andree: "Re: Will 2.6 require Python for any configuration ? (CML2)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 31 2001 - 21:00:10 EST