Re: Will 2.6 require Python for any configuration ? (CML2)

From: Tom Rini (trini@kernel.crashing.org)
Date: Sat Aug 25 2001 - 09:51:04 EST

Next message: VDA: "smbmount problems"
Previous message: Kernel Related Emails: "[PATCH] Support for new chipsets in AGPGART"
In reply to: Ben Ford: "Re: Will 2.6 require Python for any configuration ? (CML2)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 09:11:24PM -0700, Ben Ford wrote:
> Tom Rini wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 12:41:39AM +0400, Samium Gromoff wrote:
> >
> >> 1. I heard a lot of arguments why _not_ to include
> >> python. Also alot of arguments why _ignore_ the arguments
> >> to _not_ include python.
> >> BUT! No arguments why to _include_ it...
> >> kinda disbalance as i see.
> >
> >The main reason to include it, is that that's what it was done in.
>
> That is never an excuse.

Then write it in something else.

-- 
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: VDA: "smbmount problems"
Previous message: Kernel Related Emails: "[PATCH] Support for new chipsets in AGPGART"
In reply to: Ben Ford: "Re: Will 2.6 require Python for any configuration ? (CML2)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 31 2001 - 21:00:17 EST