On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 01:34:36PM -0300, Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br> wrote:
> That wouldn't have made a big difference in this case, except that
> one process doing readahead window thrashing with its own readahead
> data would have fallen over even worse ...
I don't know that case, but in my case, one process thrashing it's
read-ahead window is twice as fats as 16 processes doing so ;)
I wother wether these problems can be fixed at all, with all these
different situations where the vm behaves totally different in (seemingly)
similar cases.
--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg@goof.com |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 31 2001 - 21:00:18 EST