Re: [bug report] NFS and uninterruptable wait states

From: Doug McNaught (doug@wireboard.com)
Date: Mon Sep 03 2001 - 12:42:59 EST


Phillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com> writes:

> That's all well and good that the process won't get an error back, but imho,
> a process should *NEVER* be beyond the reach of a SIGKILL. I mean, an
> unkillable process prevents a clean shutdown, doesn't it? ( can't kill the
> process, can't unmount the filesystem ).

D state has always meant unkillable. If you don't like it, you now
know how to change it.

-Doug

-- 
Free Dmitry Sklyarov! 
http://www.freesklyarov.org/ 

We will return to our regularly scheduled signature shortly. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 07 2001 - 21:00:19 EST