On mar, 2001-09-04 at 06:09, Alexander Viro wrote:
> Read-only is more complex - in addition to mount side ("does anyone want
> it to be r/w") there is a filesystem side ("does fs agree to be r/w")...
How about, say, a reiserfs mounted r/o on a shared partition (loopback
over nfs) ? If it contains errors, maybe 2 "clients" will attempt to
rollback at the same time. Is the solution to never mount, even r/o,
remote journalling fs ?
Xav
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 07 2001 - 21:00:24 EST