Re: hamachi (GNIC-II) and 2.4.9-ac9

From: Lawrence MacIntyre (lpz@ciit.y12.doe.gov)
Date: Fri Sep 07 2001 - 13:02:05 EST

Next message: Mark H. Wood: "Re: [IDEA+RFC] Possible solution for min()/max() war"
Previous message: SATHISH.J: "Reg lilo.conf changed and system doesn't boot"
Maybe in reply to: Lawrence MacIntyre: "hamachi (GNIC-II) and 2.4.9-ac9"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hola:

2.4.4 was only trivially different from 2.4.3 so I skipped it. 2.4.5
was fine. 2.4.6 worked, but it lost a bit over 10 Mb/s in transmit
speed. 2.4.7 is broken. I only tested on the alpha.

> except that the hamachi won't work. ifconfig shows no packets received,
> but some errors, there are no strange messages in /var/log/messages. I
> then built the same kernel on the intel box, and the same thing

Curious. There are no hamachi driver differences between 2.4.9 and
2.4.9-ac
so the obvious question is which was the last version it did work ?

-- 
                                 Lawrence
                                    ~
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Lawrence MacIntyre    Center for Information Infrastructure Technology
 865.574.8696   lpz@ciit.y12.doe.gov   http://www.ciit.y12.doe.gov/~lpz
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mark H. Wood: "Re: [IDEA+RFC] Possible solution for min()/max() war"
Previous message: SATHISH.J: "Reg lilo.conf changed and system doesn't boot"
Maybe in reply to: Lawrence MacIntyre: "hamachi (GNIC-II) and 2.4.9-ac9"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 07 2001 - 21:00:42 EST