Re: Freeing inode

From: Alexander Viro (viro@math.psu.edu)
Date: Tue Sep 11 2001 - 14:01:44 EST


On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Jan Kara wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Vladimir pointed me to another bug in ext2 quota allocation. The problem is
> that when inode is being created but creation fails (either from user being
> over quota or from some other reason) then quota is decremented incorrectly
> (previously the usual case when user is over quota was handled by DQUOT_DROP()
> but this works no more because of DQUOT_INIT() in iput() and ext2_free_inode()).
> I made a patch which marks inode as bad and then quota is not initialized on
> bad inodes (which makes sence anyway). The patch which is attached is just preliminary
> and nontested (just now I'm realizing that inode being marked as bad might be
> dirty which is not probably the best combination). I'd just like to know whether
> this approach is ok with you or whether you have some better ideas.

I think I have a better approach - grab quota before everything else in
ext2_new_inode() and explicitly release the leftovers in the end. That
way we simply do not call ext2_free_inode() - if we got to allocation
we are done.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 15 2001 - 21:00:34 EST