Re: nfs is stupid ("getfh failed")

From: Marcus Sundberg (marcus@cendio.se)
Date: Wed Sep 12 2001 - 05:44:01 EST


neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au (Neil Brown) writes:

> On September 10, marcus@cendio.se wrote:
> > cachefs sucks. It doesn't seem to cache stat(2) information.
> > Doing ls -F in a ~100-entries directory takes several seconds over
> > a link with 50ms round-trip time.
>
> Well, I said "concept" not "implementation", but I suspect that
> Solaris cachefs does cache stat information. Maybe you just need to
> increase the timeouts for the attribute cache.

Considering that I did several ls'es on the order of milliseconds
apart I doubt that would help...

//Marcus

-- 
---------------------------------+---------------------------------
         Marcus Sundberg         |      Phone: +46 707 452062
   Embedded Systems Consultant   |     Email: marcus@cendio.se
        Cendio Systems AB        |      http://www.cendio.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 15 2001 - 21:00:36 EST