Re: OOPS handling proposal

From: Samium Gromoff (_deepfire@mail.ru)
Date: Thu Sep 13 2001 - 08:45:09 EST


" Andreas Dilger wrote:"
>
> On Sep 13, 2001 06:11 +0000, Samium Gromoff wrote:
> > Hello folks!
> > People most likely needs first oops most of the time, so
> > it would be great to make a kernel boot option to stop after
> > first oops, so in the situations when its neede life can be made easy.
> > Actually afaics this is being done each time by hand, so
> > panic() in BUG() as Rik proposed would be nice.
> > What do you folks think?
>
> Absolutely NOT. If you panic() in BUG() then you DO have to copy the oops
> by hand each time, whereas the normal situation is that you can keep
> running after an oops - to decode it, see what the symptoms are, check
> memory, etc.
   Hmm... I propose to make it a boot option.
   Else sometimes you wont be able to retrieve info at all, as like
 in the situation i have right now: oops in kupdated which i even
 cant post and it remains there all 2.4.8 and 2.4.9.

Cheers, Sam

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 15 2001 - 21:00:40 EST