Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool

From: Robert Love (rml@tech9.net)
Date: Thu Sep 20 2001 - 17:01:15 EST

Next message: Oliver Xymoron: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: Proposed patch to devinet.c to make SIOCGIF* more compatible"
In reply to: Tobias Diedrich: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
Next in thread: Robert Love: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 2001-09-20 at 16:01, Tobias Diedrich wrote:
> Should the patch work with SMP systems ?
> Here is what I get:

I never thought that it shouldn't, but upon thinking about it maybe it
won't :)

You are the second person reporting those all-the-same latency values.
I think the SMP locks are being reported wrongly by the patch. I will
take a look at it.

Thanks

-- Robert M. Love rml at ufl.edu rml at tech9.net

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Oliver Xymoron: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: Proposed patch to devinet.c to make SIOCGIF* more compatible"
In reply to: Tobias Diedrich: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
Next in thread: Robert Love: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 23 2001 - 21:00:40 EST