Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool

From: Jussi Laako (jussi.laako@kolumbus.fi)
Date: Fri Sep 21 2001 - 11:24:47 EST

Next message: David Chow: "Re: Wrapfs a stackable file system"
Previous message: Stefan Westerfeld: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
Reply: Thomas Sailer: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Alan Cox wrote:
>
> Sound cards have a lot of buffering, we are talking 64-128Kbytes + on
> card buffers. Thats 0.25-0.5 seconds at 48Khz 16bit stereo

Only "soundcards", that cheap crap like SoundBlaster. Professional
lowlatency soundcards usually have something like 128-512 samples per
channel for 24-bit (32-bit data) 96 kHz 8 channels...

- Jussi Laako

-- 
PGP key fingerprint: 161D 6FED 6A92 39E2 EB5B  39DD A4DE 63EB C216 1E4B
Available at PGP keyservers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David Chow: "Re: Wrapfs a stackable file system"
Previous message: Stefan Westerfeld: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
Reply: Thomas Sailer: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 23 2001 - 21:00:44 EST