Re: Linux VM design

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Tue Sep 25 2001 - 06:07:24 EST

Next message: Nicholas Knight: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4.10 improved reiserfs a lot, but could still be better"
Previous message: Matthias Andree: "Re: [RFC] OOM aware applications"
In reply to: VDA: "Re: Linux VM design"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, VDA wrote:

> I'd like your comments on this (rather simplistic) hypothetic
> VM description. If you know what's wrong with it, please tell me.

It's a nice start, but not quite accurate. You may want to
read my freenix paper and some of the documents on the
linux-mm page:

http://linux-mm.org/
http://www.surriel.com/lectures/

cheers,

Rik

-- IA64: a worthy successor to i860.

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy)

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Nicholas Knight: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4.10 improved reiserfs a lot, but could still be better"
Previous message: Matthias Andree: "Re: [RFC] OOM aware applications"
In reply to: VDA: "Re: Linux VM design"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 30 2001 - 21:00:29 EST