On Sep 25, 2001 10:49 +0530, BALBIR SINGH wrote:
> Warning: I am not aware of what was discussed earlier about these issues
> or if they were discusses at all.
They have been discussed many times. Please search for SIGDANGER in the
linux-kernel mailing list archive.
> 1. I was wondering that instead of killing the application using
> oom_kill_task() directly, should the OOM issue some kind of a
> warning by sending a signal (some signal with si_code set to a
> value indicating that the application is causing memory to run
> out). Then, wait for a while and then see if the application is
> still misbehaving and if so kill it.
This is exactly what SIGDANGER is.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger \ "If a man ate a pound of pasta and a pound of antipasto,
\ would they cancel out, leaving him still hungry?"
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/ -- Dogbert
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 30 2001 - 21:00:31 EST