I also faced this litte problem.
> Maybe by default (v)fat permissions should be
> a+x on directories and a-x on files. But then
I could live with this solution.
I could also live with a dmask option. But then it would be great to have
this option with every file system not only vfat.
> do a-x on files so this would be explicit? Maybe
> is would be better to put back the old logic? :-)
This i my preferred solution. I cannot image a situation where it is useful,
to have a execution flag on all files, if the file system has a noexec flag.
But I see a lot of problems, like the Midnight Commander Logic.
On the other side, it is quite sensible to remove the execution flags from a
file if you cannot execute them.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 30 2001 - 21:00:32 EST