On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 06:33:57PM +1000, john slee wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 10:46:36PM +0100, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> > In article <E15lH4e-0000VPemail@example.com> you wrote:
> > >> If you took my patch for it, PLEASE don't send it for inclusion; it's an
> > >> evil hack and no longer needed when Intel fixes the bug in their 440GX bios.
> > > "when" is not a word I find useful about most bios bugs. Try "if" or
> > > "less likely that being hit on the head by an asteroid"
> > This case is different. Intel promised the update "soon". For them it's
> oh, they _promised_! great!
> on another note...
> 2.4.10 is great incidentally, noticeably improved performance for
> a somewhat large postgresql db on raid0 (35GB, ~100 million rows)
This was actually the first priority and it's nice to hear it is
apparently been achieved successfully.
I also take the opportunity to remind everybody to keep the
00_vm-tweaks-1 from 2.4.10aa1 applied on top of 2.4.10, it seems quite
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 30 2001 - 21:00:32 EST