>>>>> " " == Alexander Viro <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On 25 Sep 2001, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>> Yes *please*! Finally we could introduce proper support for
>> 64-bit inode numbers too!
> Right. As soon as userland is audited for places where it uses
> int for storing inode numbers - just a couple of months after
> MS fixes all security holes in their software. By then we'll
> need 128bit time_t, though...
Anybody using the fstat64() interface has of course already done this,
and MS are known to be releasing the highly secure Windoze-XP any day
I think I could find a use for the larger time_t too...
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 30 2001 - 21:00:33 EST