Re: 2.4.10 BUG()

From: Pawel Kot (pkot@linuxnews.pl)
Date: Tue Sep 25 2001 - 18:10:40 EST

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: weird memory related problems, negative memory usage or fake memory usage?"
Previous message: Chris Newton: "FWD: RE: excessive interrupts on network cards"
In reply to: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: 2.4.10 BUG()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

Hi Andrea,

> do I guess right that you aren't running just ext2 on your machine? if
> so what other fses or patches are you running?

It was vanilla 2.4.10. No other patches. Just ext2. Reiserfs is compiled
in modules but it is not used (no modules loaded) 3 partitions.
The machine runs Celeron 366 (so no Athlon optimisations), one IDE drive
and 3c59x eth card. Rivafb compiled in.

Today I have applied ext3 patch and it runs with no problems till now.

pkot

-- mailto:pkot@linuxnews.pl :: mailto:pkot@slackware.pl http://kt.linuxnews.pl/ :: Kernel Traffic po polsku http://tfuj.pl/cv.html :: http://tfuj.pl/pgp.asc

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: weird memory related problems, negative memory usage or fake memory usage?"
Previous message: Chris Newton: "FWD: RE: excessive interrupts on network cards"
In reply to: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: 2.4.10 BUG()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 30 2001 - 21:00:38 EST