Re: VM in 2.4.10(+tweaks) vs. 2.4.9-ac14/15(+stuff)

From: Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@suse.de)
Date: Wed Sep 26 2001 - 09:03:47 EST

Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: Out of memory handling broken"
Previous message: J . A . Magallon: "Re: [PATCH] scripts/kernel-doc: support for structs, unions, enum, typedef and other stuff"
In reply to: Craig Kulesa: "VM in 2.4.10(+tweaks) vs. 2.4.9-ac14/15(+stuff)"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: VM in 2.4.10(+tweaks) vs. 2.4.9-ac14/15(+stuff)"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: VM in 2.4.10(+tweaks) vs. 2.4.9-ac14/15(+stuff)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 06:38:48AM -0700, Craig Kulesa wrote:
> in memory, and is swapping out harder to compensate. The ac14/ac15 tree

2.4.10 is swapping out more also because I don't keep track of which
pages are just uptodate on the swap space. This will be fixed as soon as
I teach get_swap_page to collect away from the swapcache mapped
exclusive swap pages.

Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: Out of memory handling broken"
Previous message: J . A . Magallon: "Re: [PATCH] scripts/kernel-doc: support for structs, unions, enum, typedef and other stuff"
In reply to: Craig Kulesa: "VM in 2.4.10(+tweaks) vs. 2.4.9-ac14/15(+stuff)"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: VM in 2.4.10(+tweaks) vs. 2.4.9-ac14/15(+stuff)"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: VM in 2.4.10(+tweaks) vs. 2.4.9-ac14/15(+stuff)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 30 2001 - 21:00:43 EST