Re: Locking comment on shrink_caches()

From: Alan Cox (
Date: Wed Sep 26 2001 - 11:40:15 EST

> Ahh, that's a cpu bug -- one my athlons don't suffer from.
> Your Athlons may handle exclusive cache line acquisition more
> efficiently (due to memory subsystem performance) but it still
> does cost something.

On an exclusive line on Athlon a lock cycle is near enough free, its
just an ordering constraint. Since the line is in E state no other bus
master can hold a copy in cache so the atomicity is there. Ditto for newer
Intel processors
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 30 2001 - 21:00:45 EST