On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 08:33:27AM +0200, Nemosoft Unv. wrote:
> Personally, I say the above piece of code is faulty. Refering to a
> pointer after you appearently deleted it, is just very bad programming
ACK ;-) And according to our CVS it is lurking around since March 2000.
There are a few similar actions in other portions of the code, but they are
correct (as far I can see...).
> I?d say, fix the usb-uhci file, and do a quick run on all other instances
> of list_del. I think most programmers got it right, or 2.4.10 kernels would
> be coming down all over the planet.
Fix attached. Please apply it.
-- Georg Acher, firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.in.tum.de/~acher/ "Oh no, not again !" The bowl of petunias
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 30 2001 - 21:00:55 EST