Re: highmem deadlock fix [was Re: VM in 2.4.10(+tweaks) vs. 2.4.9-ac14/15(+stuff)]

From: Robert Macaulay (robert_macaulay@dell.com)
Date: Fri Sep 28 2001 - 08:36:31 EST

Next message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: BUG: cat /proc/partitions endless loop"
Previous message: Petr Konecny: "2.4.10: oops and panic in usb-uhci"
In reply to: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: highmem deadlock fix [was Re: VM in 2.4.10(+tweaks) vs. 2.4.9-ac14/15(+stuff)]"
Next in thread: Robert Macaulay: "LILO causes segmentation fault and panic [was Re: highmem deadlock fix]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 27 Sep 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

>
> Ok, it is possible the 0-page alloc failed because NOHIGHIO was
> disabled, Linus's fix being less finegrined than mine could also lead
> more easily to 0-page alloc failed.
>

We got the 0-order allocation failed again. I've attached the output of
your DEBUG_GFP by itself, and run through ksymoops which kinda lumped it
all at the end. No deadlock though.

Robert

TEXT/PLAIN attachment: alloc_fails.ksymoops

TEXT/PLAIN attachment: alloc_fails

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: BUG: cat /proc/partitions endless loop"
Previous message: Petr Konecny: "2.4.10: oops and panic in usb-uhci"
In reply to: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: highmem deadlock fix [was Re: VM in 2.4.10(+tweaks) vs. 2.4.9-ac14/15(+stuff)]"
Next in thread: Robert Macaulay: "LILO causes segmentation fault and panic [was Re: highmem deadlock fix]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 30 2001 - 21:01:01 EST