Re: Adding a printk in start_secondary breaks 2.4.10, not 2.4.9 ??

From: Alan Cox (
Date: Fri Sep 28 2001 - 13:09:17 EST

> FWIW, I still think that means that the console locking changes are broken
> -
> adding a printk shouldn't panic the kernel. I'll go look at the console
> locking
> changes (*and* fix my disgusting hack ;-) )

I suspect the panic has nothing to do with adding the printk, but merely
that the timing patterns of your disgusting hack have changed

Happy logical analysers 8)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 30 2001 - 21:01:04 EST