Re: Adding a printk in start_secondary breaks 2.4.10, not 2.4.9 ??

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Fri Sep 28 2001 - 13:43:42 EST

Next message: Josh MacDonald: "Re: [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10."
Previous message: Simon Kirby: "Re: [patch] softirq-2.4.10-B2"
In reply to: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: Adding a printk in start_secondary breaks 2.4.10, not 2.4.9 ??"
Next in thread: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: Adding a printk in start_secondary breaks 2.4.10, not 2.4.9 ??"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> But this printk breaks a standard SMP machine without my patches (well,
> just this tiny printk part), not just the NUMA boxes ....

That makes the situation more interesting. Can you serialize the output
and see why ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Josh MacDonald: "Re: [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10."
Previous message: Simon Kirby: "Re: [patch] softirq-2.4.10-B2"
In reply to: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: Adding a printk in start_secondary breaks 2.4.10, not 2.4.9 ??"
Next in thread: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: Adding a printk in start_secondary breaks 2.4.10, not 2.4.9 ??"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 30 2001 - 21:01:04 EST