Re: Binary only module overview

From: Daniel Caujolle-Bert (
Date: Fri Sep 28 2001 - 14:44:39 EST

Alan Cox wrote:
> > That I would call an obvious GPL violation... no discussion
> > about vague "interfaces", if you directly link serial.c
> > (even modified) into a non-GPL .o file that's obvious....
> I raised this one with Ted T'so (who wrote the serial.c they use) a long
> time ago. Ted seemed happy for this to occur - and its kind of his code,
> his business.

        I don't understand you here, sorry, complicated sentence are
hard for me :<. Anyway, i am one of the one who hacked and old version
of this driver for 2.4.7+, of course i can understand it's a GPL
but like another guy wrote (sorry, i haven't his name liying around),
binary only module is *almost* better than no support.

73's de Daniel, F1RMB.

-=- Daniel Caujolle-Bert -=- -=- -=- (AMPR NET) -=- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to More majordomo info at Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 30 2001 - 21:01:04 EST