Re: Security question: "Text file busy" overwriting executables but not shared libraries?

From: Alexander Viro (viro@math.psu.edu)
Date: Thu Oct 04 2001 - 11:11:34 EST


On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> In short, now you need filesystem versioning at a per-page level etc.

*ding* *ding* *ding* we have a near winner. Remember, folks, Hurd had been
started by people who not only don't understand UNIX, but detest it.
ITS/TWENEX refugees. And semantics in question comes from there -
they had "open and make sure that anyone who tries to modify will get
a new version, leaving one we'd opened unchanged".

> Trust me. The people who came up with MAP_COPY were stupid. Really. It's
> an idiotic concept, and it's not worth implementing.

Well, actually that's a concept that made sense on system we got mmap from[1]
They just want infection to be complete.

[1] cue Tom Lehrer singing "I got it from Agnes, she got it from Jim"

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 07 2001 - 21:00:32 EST