Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On 4 Oct 2001, Robert Love wrote:
> >
> > Agreed. I am actually amazed that the opposite of what is happening
> > does not happen -- that more people aren't clamoring for this solution.
>
> Ehh.. I think that most people who are against Ingo's patches are so
> mainly because there _is_ an alternative that looks nicer.
>
> Linus
The alternative (NAPI) only works with Tulip and Intel NICs, it seems.
When the alternative works for every driver known (including 3rd party
ones, like the e100), then it will truly be an alternative. Untill
then, it will be a great feature for those who can use it, and the
rest of the poor folks will need a big generic hammer.
>From personal experince, I imagine the problem is also that it was
not invented here, where here is where each of sit. And I include
myself in that bias!
Ben
-- Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> <Ben_Greear AT excite.com> President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 07 2001 - 21:00:34 EST