Re: Wierd /proc/cpuinfo with 2.4.11-pre4

From: Andreas Dilger (adilger@turbolabs.com)
Date: Fri Oct 05 2001 - 18:18:15 EST


On Oct 06, 2001 01:10 +0200, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> "Martin J. Bligh" wrote:
> > Sorry. Mea culpa
> >
> > --- setup.c.old Fri Oct 5 14:20:29 2001
> > +++ setup.c Fri Oct 5 14:28:51 2001
> > @@ -2420,7 +2420,7 @@
> > * WARNING - nasty evil hack ... if we print > 8, it overflows the
> > * page buffer and corrupts memory - this needs fixing properly
> > */
> > - for (n = 0; n < 8; n++, c++) {
> > + for (n = 0; n < (clustered_apic_mode ? 8 : NR_CPUS); n++, c++) {
> > /* for (n = 0; n < NR_CPUS; n++, c++) { */
> > int fpu_exception;
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SMP

This will also fail if, for some reason "clustered_apic_mode" is set and
you have less than 8 CPUs. What you really want is to have "max(8:NR_CPUS)"
in the loop (or make the loop actually work with > 8 CPUs, which is probably
the correct solution in the long run).

Cheers, Andreas

--
Andreas Dilger  \ "If a man ate a pound of pasta and a pound of antipasto,
                 \  would they cancel out, leaving him still hungry?"
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/               -- Dogbert

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 07 2001 - 21:00:40 EST