Re: dynamic swap prioritizing

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Tue Oct 09 2001 - 20:43:37 EST

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion"
Previous message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [PATCH] Re: Discrepancies between /proc/cpuinfo and Dave J's x86info"
In reply to: Xuan Baldauf: "dynamic swap prioritizing"
Next in thread: Andreas Dilger: "Re: dynamic swap prioritizing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Xuan Baldauf wrote:

> Does the linux kernel already implement such an
> optimization? Is it planned?

No and no. But feel free to try to implement it.

I'm not sure if it would be a win to have the
system do this dynamic swap priority readjustment,
but I wouldn't be surprised if it was, either.

regards,

Rik

-- DMCA, SSSCA, W3C? Who cares? http://thefreeworld.net/ (volunteers needed)

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion"
Previous message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [PATCH] Re: Discrepancies between /proc/cpuinfo and Dave J's x86info"
In reply to: Xuan Baldauf: "dynamic swap prioritizing"
Next in thread: Andreas Dilger: "Re: dynamic swap prioritizing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 15 2001 - 21:00:28 EST