On Wed, 2001-10-10 at 20:30, Tom Rini wrote:
> Hello. In updating the PPC defconfigs, I noticed that
> drivers/usb/Config.in will ask questions on machines where CONFIG_PCI=n
> but CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL=y. The following puts all of the USB items
> under the if [ "$CONFIG_USB" = "y" -o "$CONFIG_USB" = "m" ] check and
> fixes some spacing bits.
Do we really still think USB deserves the Experimental label?
I use it all the time and it seems about as solid as any of
the other subsystems. I know drivers continue to evolve, get
bugs fixed and new ones get added, but is that a good reason
to mark all USB support experimental?
Just wondering what the criteria are,
Miles
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 15 2001 - 21:00:37 EST