DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs

• Next message: Benjamin Herrenschmidt: "Re: [RFC] New Driver Model for 2.5"
• Previous message: David S. Miller: "re: TCP hash table sizing"
• In reply to: Earle Nietzel: "Virtual Wire v.s. APIC"
• Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs"
• Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs"
• Maybe reply: Martin Devera: "Re: DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs"
• Maybe reply: Martin Devera: "Re: DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs"
• Reply: Sam Vilain: "Re: DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

While I tried to understand MM in 2.4 kernels I decided to create call
graph of it (in DOT). It could help everyone who tries to understand it.

At least they are very nice :) You can also see difference in complexity
of both VMs.

http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/mm.htm

Enjoy. devik

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Benjamin Herrenschmidt: "Re: [RFC] New Driver Model for 2.5"
• Previous message: David S. Miller: "re: TCP hash table sizing"
• In reply to: Earle Nietzel: "Virtual Wire v.s. APIC"
• Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs"
• Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs"
• Maybe reply: Martin Devera: "Re: DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs"
• Maybe reply: Martin Devera: "Re: DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs"
• Reply: Sam Vilain: "Re: DOT call graphs of Rik and AA VMs"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 23 2001 - 21:00:25 EST