Re: [compile bug] 2.4.13-pre4 | i2o_pci.c:165 structure has no member named `pdev'

• Next message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Which is better at vm, and why? 2.2 or 2.4"
• Previous message: David Wagner: "Re: Is writing to /dev/ramdom a security flaw (vserver project)"
• In reply to: Ken Brownfield: "Re: [compile bug] 2.4.13-pre4 | i2o_pci.c:165 structure has no member named `pdev'"
• Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [compile bug] 2.4.13-pre4 | i2o_pci.c:165 structure has no member named `pdev'"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

According to a few posts the last few days, it's part of an incomplete
merge betwixt -ac and linus. I assume it will get completed shortly.

David

Ken Brownfield wrote:

>It looks like this has been an issue since -pre1 -- we've seen this too
>with i2o as a module. Between .11 and the parport issue with .12, it's
>certainly been interesting recently. :)
>
>Anyone have any news on this? Sorry if I've missed it.
>
>Thanks much,
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Which is better at vm, and why? 2.2 or 2.4"
• Previous message: David Wagner: "Re: Is writing to /dev/ramdom a security flaw (vserver project)"
• In reply to: Ken Brownfield: "Re: [compile bug] 2.4.13-pre4 | i2o_pci.c:165 structure has no member named `pdev'"
• Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [compile bug] 2.4.13-pre4 | i2o_pci.c:165 structure has no member named `pdev'"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 23 2001 - 21:00:25 EST