Re: Poor floppy performance in kernel 2.4.10

From: Nick LeRoy (nleroy@cs.wisc.edu)
Date: Mon Oct 22 2001 - 09:07:00 EST


On Sunday 21 October 2001 06:36, Alain Knaff wrote:

(snip)

> Nick LeRoy wrote:
> >Perhaps there should be a pair of "mtools" added: mopen and mclose, that
> > do basically this. That way it could be a "standard" item, documented in
> > man pages, etc., not some secret that only the l-k users know. Thoughts?
>
> A nice workaround. However, personnally I'd rather have this fixed in
> the kernel, rather than having to resort to those kinds of
> workarounds. Moreover, this is potentially dangerous: it could
> actually mask a real disk change, if the user forgets the mclose. The
> same holds for other techniques, such as sleep 3600 </dev/fd0 & Btw,
> it works now (actual disk change detected, even while the sleep runs),
> but who will guarantee it still will work in 2.6 ?
>
> Nevertheless, I'm thinking about introducing this to mtools as a
> stop-gap measure, but with ample warnings in the manpage...

Absolutely... I *would not* advocate this as a real fix if we can, in
general, get the interrupt to work... I would advocate a *real* fix in the
kernel, and this using mopen/mclose for broken hardware & kernels that don't
handle it as gracefully.

-Nick
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 23 2001 - 21:00:30 EST