Slightly off topic, but I kinda find it cool that this thread is still going, seeing as I started it on the 15th. =)
Anyhow, have we decided that 2.5 should have the ac-vm or the linus-vm?
On 22-Oct-2001, Oliver Xymoron wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Marcelo Roberto Jimenez wrote:
>
> > Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > > Too ugly for words.
> > > >
> > > > Though, if it's done from the start of 2.5, it could be very possible.
> > > > Is there a way to make it non-ugly?
> > >
> > > I would hope by then we have a definitive answer as to the best path in
> > > the VM world
> >
> > Maybe there's no such answer. Maybe it's undecidable. In the
> > mathematical (G?del) sense.
>
> In the event that we're unable to determine which one has the best
> performance in a finite amount of time, the simpler design wins.
> So there will be a decision.
>
> --
> "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.."
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-- Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || unknown@panax.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 23 2001 - 21:00:34 EST