Re: How should we do a 64-bit jiffies?

From: Keith Owens (kaos@ocs.com.au)
Date: Tue Oct 23 2001 - 00:10:48 EST


On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 08:12:24 -0700,
george anzinger <george@mvista.com> wrote:
>I am working on POSIX timers where there is defined a CLOCK_MONOTONIC.
>The most reasonable implementation of this clock is that it is "uptime"
>or jiffies. The problem is that it is most definitely not MONOTONIC
>when it rolls back to 0 :( Thus the need for 64-bits.

If you want to leave existing kernel code alone so it still uses 32 bit
jiffies, just maintain a separate high order 32 bit field which is only
used by the code that really needs it. On 32 bit machines, the jiffie
code does

  old_jiffies = jiffies++;
  if (jiffies < old_jiffies)
          ++high_jiffies;

You will need a spin lock around that on 32 bit systems, but that is
true for anything that tries to do 64 bit counter updates on a 32 bit
system. None of your suggestions will work on ix86, it does not
support atomic updates on 64 bit fields in hardware.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 23 2001 - 21:00:35 EST