Re: Linux 2.2.20pre10

From: Geert Uytterhoeven (geert@linux-m68k.org)
Date: Tue Oct 23 2001 - 11:27:51 EST

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "x86 smp_call_function recent breakage"
Previous message: antirez: "Re: More memory == better?"
In reply to: Craig Dickson: "Re: Linux 2.2.20pre10"
Next in thread: Aaron Lehmann: "Re: Linux 2.2.20pre10"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Craig Dickson wrote:
> If the source code itself somehow becomes illegal, or if Alan can talk
> Linus into placing a geographical restriction on the distribution of
> Linux (which, as the trademark and copyright owner, would be within his
> rights), then the changelog issue will be moot.

Linus cannot do that, since he doesn't own the copyright on the parts written
by others.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "x86 smp_call_function recent breakage"
Previous message: antirez: "Re: More memory == better?"
In reply to: Craig Dickson: "Re: Linux 2.2.20pre10"
Next in thread: Aaron Lehmann: "Re: Linux 2.2.20pre10"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 23 2001 - 21:00:39 EST