Re: Depmod errors with fs modules, 2.4.12-ac3

From: Ken Moffat (ken@kenmoffat.uklinux.net)
Date: Wed Oct 24 2001 - 16:57:31 EST

Next message: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: [Q] cannot fork w/ 1000s of procs (but still mem avail.)"
Previous message: Mike Castle: "modprobe problem with block-major-11"
In reply to: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Depmod errors with fs modules, 2.4.12-ac3"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Sorry, config now attached. Compiler is gcc3.0. It looks as if I've built
nfsv3 into the kernel, with nfs as modules, I'll give it another go
tomorrow with it all as modules. (I was trying to get ready to use nfs,
guess I didn't quite get the .config right.)

Ken

On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Mike Fedyk wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 10:11:10PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > I got the attached errors (in lockd.o, nfs.o, nfsd.o) tonight. Kernel is
> > 2.4.12-ac3 with the preemptive patch.
> >
>
> Strange, I've used that kernel with nfs modules without problems. Do you
> have nfsV3 enabled?
>
> What about compiler version, and .config?
>

-- If a six turned out to be nine, I don't mind.

Home page : http://www.kenmoffat.uklinux.net

TEXT/PLAIN attachment: 2412ac3config

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: [Q] cannot fork w/ 1000s of procs (but still mem avail.)"
Previous message: Mike Castle: "modprobe problem with block-major-11"
In reply to: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Depmod errors with fs modules, 2.4.12-ac3"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 31 2001 - 21:00:24 EST