Re: Nasty suprise with uptime

From: Mike Fedyk (mfedyk@matchmail.com)
Date: Tue Oct 30 2001 - 02:46:15 EST


On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 06:46:03PM +1100, Neale Banks wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > > and received a nasty surprise. The uptime, which had been 496+ days
> > > on Friday, was back down to a few hours. I was ready to lart somebody
> > > with great vigor when I realized the uptime counter had simply wrapped
> > > around.
> > >
> > > So, I thought to myself, at least the 2.4 kernels on our new boxes won't
> >
> > It wraps at 496 days. The drivers are aware of it and dont crash the box
>
> You mean there was a time when uptime>496days would crash a system?
>
> If so, approximtely when did that get fixed?
>
> (I'm thinking back to an as yet unexplained crash of a 2.0.38 system at
> ~496days uptime :-( )
>

AFAIK, the system didn't crash, but the uptime counter went down to zero.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 31 2001 - 21:00:39 EST