Re: [BUG] Smbfs + preempt on 2.4.10

From: vda (vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua)
Date: Wed Oct 31 2001 - 07:10:38 EST

Next message: Timo Jantunen: "Re: Identify IDE device?"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: SPARC and SA_SIGINFO signal handling"
In reply to: Robert Love: "Re: [BUG] Smbfs + preempt on 2.4.10"
Next in thread: vda: "Re: [BUG] Smbfs + preempt on 2.4.10"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> > > I narrowed down Samba weirdness I observe on 2.4.10 to preempt patch.
> > > Plain 2.4.10 works fine, 2.4.10+preempt (with latency measurement
> > > turned on) is sometimes oopses, and sometimes reports 'file already
> > > exists' when I attempt to copy a file from WinNT box to Linux.
> > > Sometimes it works ok (50% or so...)
> >
> > Why not try a recent kernel + preempt?
>
> Yes, would you mind retesting on a recent kernel and a recent patch?

2.4.13+preempt exhibits the same bug (latency measurement patch not applied).

I am still very willing to help in stomping on this bug.

--
vda 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Timo Jantunen: "Re: Identify IDE device?"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: SPARC and SA_SIGINFO signal handling"
In reply to: Robert Love: "Re: [BUG] Smbfs + preempt on 2.4.10"
Next in thread: vda: "Re: [BUG] Smbfs + preempt on 2.4.10"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 31 2001 - 21:00:43 EST