Re: cdrecord from ext3

From: H. Peter Anvin (hpa@zytor.com)
Date: Wed Oct 31 2001 - 12:52:40 EST

Next message: Lorenzo Allegrucci: "Re: new OOM heuristic failure (was: Re: VM: qsbench)"
Previous message: Lorenzo Allegrucci: "Re: VM: qsbench"
In reply to: J . A . Magallon: "Re: cdrecord from ext3"
Next in thread: Mike Castle: "Re: cdrecord from ext3"
Reply: Mike Castle: "Re: cdrecord from ext3"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Followup to: <20011031155934.A18608@werewolf.able.es>
By author: "J . A . Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Did you noticed that the ext3 was at 20MHz, and ext2 was at 40MHz ? I
> will reformat the 20MHz drive and make 2 slices, one ext2 and one ext3
> to be sure not to compare apples and oranges...
>

Doesn't work. Low block numbers (outer edge of the disk) is
invariably faster than high block numbers (inner edge of the disk) on
all drives that are even close to recent.

-hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt	<amsp@zytor.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Lorenzo Allegrucci: "Re: new OOM heuristic failure (was: Re: VM: qsbench)"
Previous message: Lorenzo Allegrucci: "Re: VM: qsbench"
In reply to: J . A . Magallon: "Re: cdrecord from ext3"
Next in thread: Mike Castle: "Re: cdrecord from ext3"
Reply: Mike Castle: "Re: cdrecord from ext3"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 31 2001 - 21:00:45 EST